Class 12Physics · Modern PhysicsFull chapter

Atoms

The whole chapter in one place — read it, then test yourself. Clear notes, formula sheet, a practice quiz, and worked NCERT solutions & PYQs.

Rutherford's Nuclear Model of the Atom

Quick answer The alpha-scattering experiment showed that an atom's positive charge and nearly all its mass are concentrated in a tiny central nucleus, with electrons revolving around it in mostly empty space.

By the early 1900s, J. J. Thomson had proposed that an atom is a sphere of positive charge with electrons embedded in it, like seeds in a watermelon (the "plum-pudding" model). To test this, Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden, working under Ernest Rutherford, fired a narrow beam of fast, energetic alpha (α) particles (helium nuclei, charge +2e) at a very thin gold foil and observed how the particles scattered using a rotatable zinc-sulphide detecting screen.

Three observations stood out. Most α-particles passed straight through the foil with little or no deflection. A small fraction were deflected through moderate angles. Most strikingly, about 1 in every 8000 α-particles bounced back through angles greater than 90°, some almost straight back towards the source. A spread-out positive charge (as in Thomson's model) could never produce such large single-collision deflections, since it exerts only a weak, gradually varying force on a passing α-particle.

Rutherford concluded that the positive charge and almost the entire mass of the atom must be concentrated in an extremely small central region called the nucleus, with electrons revolving around it at comparatively large distances, held by Coulomb attraction. Since most α-particles pass through undeflected, an atom is mostly empty space; the nucleus occupies a radius of about 10-14 m compared with the atom's overall radius of about 10-10 m — the nucleus is roughly 10,000 times smaller than the atom.

For a head-on (zero impact parameter) collision, the α-particle momentarily comes to rest at the point of closest approach, where its entire initial kinetic energy K has converted into electrostatic potential energy. Equating these gives the distance of closest approach r₀, an experimental upper bound on the size of the nucleus. For an off-centre collision with impact parameter b, the scattering angle θ decreases as b increases — small b (near head-on) gives large θ, and large b gives only a small deflection.

Worked example: An α-particle of kinetic energy 5.5 MeV is scattered head-on by a gold nucleus (Z = 79). Find the distance of closest approach.
K = 5.5 MeV = 5.5 × 10⁶ × 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ J = 8.8 × 10⁻¹³ J.
r₀ = (1/4πε₀) × (2Ze²)/K = (9 × 10⁹ × 2 × 79 × (1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹)²)/(8.8 × 10⁻¹³)
r₀ = (9 × 10⁹ × 158 × 2.56 × 10⁻³⁸)/(8.8 × 10⁻¹³) ≈ 3.64 × 10⁻²⁶/8.8 × 10⁻¹³ ≈ 4.14 × 10⁻¹⁴ m.
This is about 41 femtometres, confirming that gold's positive charge is confined to a region roughly 10,000 times smaller than the atom itself.

Distance of closest approach (head-on, b = 0) r₀ = (1/4πε₀) × (2Ze²)/K m · K = kinetic energy of the α-particle, Z = atomic number of the target nucleus; gives an upper limit on nuclear size.
Impact parameter b = (1/4πε₀) × (Ze²cot(θ/2))/K m · b is the perpendicular offset of the incoming α-particle from the nucleus; larger b gives a smaller scattering angle θ.
Remember
  • Most α-particles pass straight through a thin gold foil, so an atom is mostly empty space.
  • About 1 in 8000 α-particles are deflected by more than 90°, showing a concentrated positive charge.
  • The nucleus carries almost all the atomic mass and positive charge, in a radius ~10⁻¹⁴ m (atom ~10⁻¹⁰ m).
  • Electrons revolve around the nucleus, held by electrostatic (Coulomb) attraction.
  • The Rutherford model could not explain why orbiting (accelerating) electrons do not radiate energy and spiral into the nucleus, nor the observed discrete line spectra.

Atomic Spectra and the Rydberg Formula

Quick answer Each element emits and absorbs light only at certain sharp wavelengths, forming a characteristic line spectrum; for hydrogen these lines fall into series described by the empirical Rydberg formula.

When a gas is excited (for example, by an electric discharge) and its light is passed through a prism or grating, it does not give a continuous rainbow but a series of sharp, bright lines at specific wavelengths — an emission line spectrum. The reverse experiment, passing white light through a cool gas, produces dark lines at the very same wavelengths — an absorption spectrum. Every element has its own unique pattern of lines, which acts like a fingerprint and can be used to identify elements even in distant stars.

Hydrogen, having only one electron, has the simplest and most systematic spectrum. In 1885, Johann Balmer found an empirical formula that fit the four then-known visible hydrogen lines. This was later generalised by Johannes Rydberg into a single formula covering all the observed series of hydrogen lines, well before any theoretical model could explain why it worked.

Each series corresponds to transitions ending on the same lower level n₁, while the upper level n₂ takes successive integer values greater than n₁: the Lyman series (n₁ = 1, ultraviolet), Balmer series (n₁ = 2, partly visible), Paschen series (n₁ = 3, infrared), Brackett series (n₁ = 4, infrared) and Pfund series (n₁ = 5, infrared). Within each series, the lines crowd together and converge to a shortest-wavelength series limit as n₂ → ∞.

Worked example: Find the series limit (shortest wavelength) of the Balmer series.
Series limit corresponds to n₁ = 2, n₂ → ∞, so 1/n₂² → 0.
1/λ = R(1/2² − 0) = R/4 = 1.097 × 10⁷/4 = 2.7425 × 10⁶ m⁻¹.
λ = 1/(2.7425 × 10⁶) ≈ 3.646 × 10⁻⁷ m = 364.6 nm.
All Balmer lines therefore lie between 364.6 nm and the first (longest-wavelength) member of the series.

Rydberg formula (empirical) 1/λ = R(1/n₁² − 1/n₂²) λ in m, R in m⁻¹ · n₂ > n₁ are positive integers; R = 1.097 × 10⁷ m⁻¹ is the Rydberg constant, found empirically here and derived theoretically from Bohr's model.
Remember
  • Each element has a unique line emission/absorption spectrum used to identify it.
  • The hydrogen spectrum was found empirically to fit the Rydberg formula before Bohr's theory explained it.
  • Lyman series (n₁=1) lies in the UV; Balmer series (n₁=2) is the only series with lines in the visible range.
  • Paschen, Brackett and Pfund series (n₁=3,4,5) lie in the infrared.
  • Lines within a series converge to a series limit as the upper level n₂ → ∞.

Bohr's Postulates and Quantisation of Angular Momentum

Quick answer Bohr combined classical orbital mechanics with new quantum rules to fix Rutherford's two failures: atomic stability and discrete spectral lines.

Rutherford's planetary model correctly located the nucleus but classical electromagnetism predicted disaster: an electron orbiting (i.e. accelerating) should continuously radiate energy, spiral inward, and collapse into the nucleus in a fraction of a second — and it should emit a continuous spectrum as it does so. Neither is observed; atoms are stable and emit only discrete lines. In 1913, Niels Bohr resolved this by proposing that, for the hydrogen atom, classical mechanics is supplemented by quantum conditions, expressed as three postulates.

Postulate 1 (stationary orbits): An electron can revolve only in certain special orbits, called stationary states, without radiating energy, even though it is accelerating. In these orbits, the Coulomb force of attraction on the electron provides exactly the centripetal force needed for circular motion.

Postulate 2 (quantisation of angular momentum): Only those orbits are allowed for which the orbital angular momentum is an integral multiple of h/2π (i.e. of ħ). This is an ad hoc quantum rule with no classical justification at the time; it was justified later by de Broglie's matter-wave hypothesis.

Postulate 3 (Bohr frequency condition): An atom can emit or absorb radiation only when an electron jumps from one stationary orbit to another. If the electron falls from a higher-energy orbit Eᵢ to a lower-energy orbit E_f, a photon of frequency ν is emitted such that the photon energy equals the energy difference between the two orbits. The same relation governs absorption when the electron jumps up.

Together these three postulates explain both why atoms are stable (electrons don't radiate while in a stationary orbit) and why atomic spectra are discrete lines rather than a continuum (only specific energy jumps, hence specific photon energies/wavelengths, are allowed).

Quantisation of angular momentum (Bohr's 2nd postulate) L = mvr = nh/2π = nħ kg·m²/s · n = 1, 2, 3, … is the principal quantum number; h = 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s is Planck's constant, ħ = h/2π.
Bohr frequency condition hν = Eᵢ − E_f J (or eV) · A photon is emitted (Eᵢ > E_f) or absorbed (Eᵢ < E_f) only when the electron jumps between two stationary orbits.
Remember
  • Electrons occupy only certain stationary orbits in which they do not radiate energy, even though centripetally accelerating.
  • Angular momentum is quantised: L = mvr = nh/2π, n = 1, 2, 3, … (the principal quantum number).
  • Radiation is emitted or absorbed only when an electron transitions between two stationary orbits.
  • The photon energy in a transition equals the energy difference between the initial and final orbits (Bohr frequency condition).
  • Bohr's model is a semi-classical hybrid: classical circular orbits combined with an imposed quantum rule.

Radius, Speed and Energy of Bohr Orbits

Quick answer Combining the Coulomb force as centripetal force with the angular-momentum quantisation condition gives explicit formulas for the radius, speed and energy of every allowed hydrogen orbit.

For an electron of charge −e moving in a circular orbit of radius r around a nucleus of charge +Ze, the electrostatic force of attraction supplies the centripetal force: (1/4πε₀)(Ze²/r²) = mv²/r, which gives v² = Ze²/(4πε₀mr). Combining this with Bohr's quantisation condition mvr = nh/2π and eliminating v algebraically gives the radius of the nth allowed orbit.

For hydrogen (Z = 1), the smallest orbit (n = 1) has radius a₀ = 0.529 × 10⁻¹⁰ m, called the Bohr radius. Since rₙ ∝ n², orbits expand rapidly for higher n. Substituting rₙ back into v = nh/(2πmrₙ) gives the orbital speed vₙ, which for hydrogen's ground state works out to about 2.19 × 10⁶ m/s (roughly c/137) and decreases as 1/n for higher orbits.

The total energy of the electron in the nth orbit is the sum of kinetic energy (½mv²) and electrostatic potential energy (−(1/4πε₀)(Ze²/r)); working through the algebra gives Eₙ = −13.6 Z²/n² eV for hydrogen-like atoms. The negative sign shows the electron is bound to the nucleus; as n → ∞, Eₙ → 0, corresponding to a free (ionised) electron. The ground state energy E₁ = −13.6 eV is therefore also the ionisation energy of hydrogen — the minimum energy needed to remove the electron completely.

Worked example: Find the radius and energy of the n = 2 orbit of a hydrogen atom.
r₂ = n²a₀ = 2² × 0.529 Å = 4 × 0.529 Å = 2.116 Å = 2.116 × 10⁻¹⁰ m.
E₂ = −13.6/2² eV = −13.6/4 eV = −3.4 eV.
So an electron lifted from the ground state (−13.6 eV) to n = 2 (−3.4 eV) has absorbed 10.2 eV of energy.

Radius of nth Bohr orbit rₙ = n²a₀/Z m · a₀ = 0.529 × 10⁻¹⁰ m is the Bohr radius (n = 1, Z = 1 for hydrogen).
Speed of electron in nth orbit vₙ = Ze²/(2ε₀nh) = v₁/n m/s · v₁ ≈ 2.19 × 10⁶ m/s for hydrogen's ground state (n=1, Z=1).
Total energy of nth orbit Eₙ = −13.6 Z²/n² eV eV · Negative sign indicates a bound electron; Z = 1 for hydrogen, higher Z for hydrogen-like ions such as He⁺, Li²⁺.
Remember
  • Bohr radius rₙ = n²a₀/Z grows as the square of the principal quantum number n.
  • For hydrogen, a₀ = 0.529 × 10⁻¹⁰ m is the ground-state (n=1) orbit radius.
  • Orbital speed vₙ decreases as 1/n; v₁ ≈ 2.19 × 10⁶ m/s for hydrogen (about c/137).
  • Orbital energy Eₙ = −13.6 Z²/n² eV is negative (bound electron) and increases (becomes less negative) with n.
  • E₁ = −13.6 eV is the hydrogen ground-state energy and equals its ionisation energy.

Explaining the Hydrogen Line Spectra

Quick answer Bohr's energy-level formula, combined with the frequency condition, derives the Rydberg formula from first principles and correctly predicts every observed hydrogen spectral series.

Bohr's third postulate says a photon is emitted when an electron falls from an orbit n₂ to a lower orbit n₁, with photon energy hc/λ = Eₙ₂ − Eₙ₁. Substituting the orbital energy formula Eₙ = −13.6Z²/n² eV derived from the first two postulates gives 1/λ = RZ²(1/n₁² − 1/n₂²), which is exactly the empirical Rydberg formula found decades earlier — and it even predicts the correct numerical value of R purely from fundamental constants (e, m, ε₀, h, c). This was one of the great triumphs of Bohr's theory.

Every observed hydrogen series now has a clean explanation as transitions ending on a common lower level: Lyman (n₁=1), Balmer (n₁=2), Paschen (n₁=3), Brackett (n₁=4) and Pfund (n₁=5), with the upper level n₂ taking all integer values greater than n₁. An atom initially excited to level n can cascade down to the ground state through several possible intermediate steps, so more than one wavelength can be emitted from a single excited sample; the total number of distinct spectral lines possible is n(n−1)/2.

Worked example 1: Find the wavelength of the Hα line (Balmer series, n₂ = 3 → n₁ = 2).
1/λ = R(1/2² − 1/3²) = 1.097 × 10⁷ × (0.25 − 0.1111) = 1.097 × 10⁷ × 0.1389 ≈ 1.524 × 10⁶ m⁻¹.
λ = 1/(1.524 × 10⁶) ≈ 6.563 × 10⁻⁷ m = 656.3 nm, the familiar red Balmer line, matching observation.

Worked example 2: If a hydrogen atom is excited to n = 4, how many spectral lines can it emit while returning to the ground state?
N = n(n−1)/2 = 4 × 3/2 = 6 possible transitions (4→3, 4→2, 4→1, 3→2, 3→1, 2→1), so up to 6 distinct wavelengths can appear in the spectrum.

Rydberg formula derived from Bohr theory 1/λ = RZ²(1/n₁² − 1/n₂²) m⁻¹ · Derived from hc/λ = Eₙ₂ − Eₙ₁ using Eₙ = −13.6Z²/n² eV; reduces to the empirical Rydberg formula for hydrogen (Z=1).
Number of possible spectral lines N = n(n − 1)/2 — · Total number of distinct emission lines possible as an electron initially in level n cascades down to the ground state.
Remember
  • The Rydberg formula can be derived theoretically from Bohr's energy levels: 1/λ = RZ²(1/n₁² − 1/n₂²).
  • Bohr's theory predicts the numerical value of the Rydberg constant R from fundamental constants alone.
  • Each spectral series (Lyman, Balmer, Paschen, Brackett, Pfund) corresponds to transitions to a fixed lower level n₁.
  • The number of possible emission lines from level n cascading to the ground state is n(n−1)/2.
  • The Balmer Hα line (n=3→2) has wavelength 656.3 nm; the Lyman series lies entirely in the UV.

de Broglie's Explanation and Limitations of the Bohr Model

Quick answer de Broglie's matter-wave hypothesis gives a physical justification for Bohr's angular-momentum quantisation rule, though the Bohr model itself remains limited to simple one-electron systems.

Bohr's angular-momentum condition (mvr = nh/2π) worked brilliantly but had no physical justification — it was simply assumed to fit the data. In 1924, Louis de Broglie proposed that every moving particle has an associated matter wave of wavelength λ = h/(mv). Applying this to the orbiting electron gives a natural explanation: a stationary orbit is stable precisely when the electron's wave forms a standing wave that closes smoothly on itself around the orbit, i.e. the orbit's circumference must contain a whole number of de Broglie wavelengths.

This standing-wave condition is written 2πrₙ = nλ. Substituting the de Broglie wavelength λ = h/(mv) immediately gives 2πrₙ = nh/(mv), which rearranges to mvrₙ = nh/2π — exactly Bohr's second postulate, now derived rather than assumed. If the orbit did not contain a whole number of wavelengths, the electron wave would interfere destructively with itself over successive revolutions and the orbit could not persist.

Worked example: Verify the standing-wave condition for the n = 1 (ground-state) orbit of hydrogen.
r₁ = 0.529 × 10⁻¹⁰ m, so circumference = 2πr₁ = 2π × 0.529 × 10⁻¹⁰ ≈ 3.324 × 10⁻¹⁰ m.
Using v₁ = 2.19 × 10⁶ m/s: λ = h/(mv₁) = (6.626 × 10⁻³⁴)/(9.11 × 10⁻³¹ × 2.19 × 10⁶) ≈ 3.32 × 10⁻¹⁰ m.
The circumference equals almost exactly one de Broglie wavelength (n = 1), confirming the standing-wave picture.

Despite this success, the Bohr model has real limitations. It gives accurate results only for hydrogen and other single-electron (hydrogen-like) systems such as He⁺ and Li²⁺; it cannot correctly predict the spectra of multi-electron atoms, where electron-electron repulsion matters. It also cannot explain the relative intensities of different spectral lines, the fine structure (small splitting) of spectral lines, or the splitting of lines in electric fields (Stark effect) and magnetic fields (Zeeman effect). Being a semi-classical patchwork of classical orbits plus an imposed quantum rule, the Bohr model was eventually superseded by full quantum mechanics based on the Schrödinger equation, which treats the electron entirely as a wave (via a probability amplitude) rather than a particle in a definite orbit.

de Broglie wavelength λ = h/(mv) m · Matter-wave wavelength of an electron (or any particle) of mass m moving with speed v.
Standing-wave (quantisation) condition 2πrₙ = nλ m · The nth Bohr orbit must contain a whole number of electron de Broglie wavelengths; substituting λ = h/mv reproduces mvrₙ = nh/2π.
Remember
  • de Broglie proposed a matter wavelength λ = h/(mv) for every moving particle, including the orbiting electron.
  • Stable Bohr orbits are standing waves: the orbit circumference equals a whole number of de Broglie wavelengths, 2πrₙ = nλ.
  • This derives Bohr's angular-momentum quantisation (mvrₙ = nh/2π) instead of merely assuming it.
  • The Bohr model works accurately only for hydrogen and other single-electron (hydrogen-like) systems.
  • It cannot explain line intensities, fine structure, or Zeeman/Stark splitting; full quantum mechanics (Schrödinger's equation) was needed to resolve these.

The formula sheet

Every formula in this chapter, in one place — screenshot it before your exam.

r₀ = (1/4πε₀) × (2Ze²)/K
Distance of closest approach (head-on, b = 0)m
b = (1/4πε₀) × (Ze²cot(θ/2))/K
Impact parameterm
1/λ = R(1/n₁² − 1/n₂²)
Rydberg formula (empirical)λ in m, R in m⁻¹
L = mvr = nh/2π = nħ
Quantisation of angular momentum (Bohr's 2nd postulate)kg·m²/s
hν = Eᵢ − E_f
Bohr frequency conditionJ (or eV)
rₙ = n²a₀/Z
Radius of nth Bohr orbitm
vₙ = Ze²/(2ε₀nh) = v₁/n
Speed of electron in nth orbitm/s
Eₙ = −13.6 Z²/n² eV
Total energy of nth orbiteV
1/λ = RZ²(1/n₁² − 1/n₂²)
Rydberg formula derived from Bohr theorym⁻¹
N = n(n − 1)/2
Number of possible spectral lines
λ = h/(mv)
de Broglie wavelengthm
2πrₙ = nλ
Standing-wave (quantisation) conditionm

Test yourself

Tap an answer to check it instantly — you'll see why it's right, and what to revise if it isn't.

0 correct · 0/12 answered
Q1 Rutherford scattering easy

In the Geiger–Marsden (alpha-scattering) experiment, what did the occasional large-angle deflection (>90°) of alpha particles indicate?

Q2 Limitations of Rutherford model easy

Which of the following could Rutherford's nuclear model NOT explain?

Q3 Spectral series easy

The Lyman series of the hydrogen spectrum, corresponding to transitions ending on n = 1, lies in which region of the electromagnetic spectrum?

Q4 Bohr's postulates medium

According to Bohr's second postulate, the angular momentum of an electron in the nth orbit is quantised as:

Q5 Bohr orbit radius medium

If the radius of the first Bohr orbit of hydrogen is 0.529 Å, what is the radius of the third orbit (n = 3)?

Q6 Bohr energy levels medium

The ground-state energy of the hydrogen atom is −13.6 eV. What is its energy in the n = 2 state?

Q7 Hydrogen spectral lines medium

The wavelength of the Hα line (Balmer series, n = 3 → n = 2 transition) is closest to:

Q8 Hydrogen-like ions hard

What is the ionisation energy of a He⁺ ion (Z = 2, single electron) in its ground state?

Q9 de Broglie explanation hard

De Broglie's matter-wave hypothesis provides a physical basis for which of Bohr's postulates?

Q10 Spectral line counting hard

A hydrogen atom is excited from the ground state to the n = 4 level. How many different spectral lines can it emit as it returns to the ground state?

Q11 Rutherford scattering hard

For a head-on (b = 0) collision between an alpha particle and a nucleus, the distance of closest approach r₀ is inversely proportional to:

Q12 Limitations of Bohr model hard

Which of the following is a genuine limitation of the Bohr model, resolved only by full quantum mechanics (Schrödinger's equation)?

NCERT solutions & previous-year questions

Step-by-step model answers — tap a question to reveal the full solution.

NCERT questions 6

1 An alpha particle of kinetic energy 5.5 MeV is scattered head-on by a nucleus of gold (Z = 79). Calculate the distance of closest approach.Rutherford scattering

For a head-on collision, all the kinetic energy K of the α-particle converts to electrostatic potential energy at the distance of closest approach r₀:

r₀ = (1/4πε₀) × (2Ze²)/K

Given: K = 5.5 MeV = 5.5 × 10⁶ × 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ J = 8.8 × 10⁻¹³ J, Z = 79, e = 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ C, 1/4πε₀ = 9 × 10⁹ N·m²/C².

r₀ = (9 × 10⁹ × 2 × 79 × (1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹)²)/(8.8 × 10⁻¹³)
= (9 × 10⁹ × 158 × 2.56 × 10⁻³⁸)/(8.8 × 10⁻¹³)
= 3.64 × 10⁻²⁶/8.8 × 10⁻¹³
≈ 4.14 × 10⁻¹⁴ m

So the alpha particle approaches to within about 4.1 × 10⁻¹⁴ m (≈ 41 fm) of the gold nucleus, which sets an upper limit on the size of the nucleus.

2 A 12.5 eV electron beam is used to bombard gaseous hydrogen at room temperature. Up to which energy level will the hydrogen atoms be excited? Calculate the wavelengths of the first member of the Lyman series and the first member of the Balmer series.Excitation energy and spectral lines

Excitation level: The energy needed to excite a hydrogen atom from the ground state (n=1) to level n is ΔE = 13.6(1 − 1/n²) eV.

For n = 3: ΔE = 13.6 × (1 − 1/9) = 13.6 × 8/9 ≈ 12.09 eV (available, since 12.09 < 12.5 eV).
For n = 4: ΔE = 13.6 × (1 − 1/16) = 13.6 × 15/16 = 12.75 eV (NOT available, since 12.75 > 12.5 eV).

So the 12.5 eV electron beam can excite hydrogen atoms only up to n = 3.

First member of Lyman series (transition n = 2 → n = 1):
1/λ = R(1/1² − 1/2²) = 1.097 × 10⁷ × (1 − 0.25) = 1.097 × 10⁷ × 0.75 = 8.2275 × 10⁶ m⁻¹
λ = 1/(8.2275 × 10⁶) ≈ 1.215 × 10⁻⁷ m = 121.5 nm

First member of Balmer series (transition n = 3 → n = 2):
1/λ = R(1/2² − 1/3²) = 1.097 × 10⁷ × (0.25 − 0.1111) = 1.097 × 10⁷ × 0.1389 ≈ 1.524 × 10⁶ m⁻¹
λ = 1/(1.524 × 10⁶) ≈ 6.563 × 10⁻⁷ m = 656.3 nm

3 Using Bohr's model, calculate the speed of the electron in a hydrogen atom in the n = 1, 2 and 3 orbits. Also calculate the orbital period in each of these levels.Orbital speed and period

Speed: vₙ = v₁/n, with v₁ ≈ 2.19 × 10⁶ m/s for hydrogen's ground state.

v₁ = 2.19 × 10⁶ m/s
v₂ = v₁/2 = 1.095 × 10⁶ m/s
v₃ = v₁/3 ≈ 0.73 × 10⁶ m/s

Orbital period: Since T = 2πr/v, and rₙ = n²r₁, vₙ = v₁/n, we get Tₙ = 2πr₁n²/(v₁/n) = n³ × (2πr₁/v₁) = n³T₁.

T₁ = 2πr₁/v₁ = (2π × 5.29 × 10⁻¹¹)/(2.19 × 10⁶) = (3.324 × 10⁻¹⁰)/(2.19 × 10⁶) ≈ 1.52 × 10⁻¹⁶ s

T₂ = 2³ × T₁ = 8 × 1.52 × 10⁻¹⁶ ≈ 1.22 × 10⁻¹⁵ s
T₃ = 3³ × T₁ = 27 × 1.52 × 10⁻¹⁶ ≈ 4.10 × 10⁻¹⁵ s

4 The radius of the innermost electron orbit of a hydrogen atom is 5.3 × 10⁻¹¹ m. What are the radii of the n = 2 and n = 3 orbits?Bohr orbit radius

The radius of the nth Bohr orbit is rₙ = n²r₁, where r₁ = 5.3 × 10⁻¹¹ m.

r₂ = 2² × 5.3 × 10⁻¹¹ = 4 × 5.3 × 10⁻¹¹ = 2.12 × 10⁻¹⁰ m

r₃ = 3² × 5.3 × 10⁻¹¹ = 9 × 5.3 × 10⁻¹¹ = 4.77 × 10⁻¹⁰ m

5 In accordance with the Bohr's model, find the quantum number that characterises the earth's revolution around the sun in an orbit of radius 1.5 × 10¹¹ m with orbital speed 3 × 10⁴ m/s. (Take the mass of the earth as 6.0 × 10²⁴ kg.) Comment on the result.Correspondence principle

Treating the Earth–Sun system with Bohr's quantisation rule L = nħ, the orbital angular momentum of the earth is:

L = Mₑvr = 6.0 × 10²⁴ × 3 × 10⁴ × 1.5 × 10¹¹ = 2.7 × 10⁴⁰ kg·m²/s

n = L/ħ = (2.7 × 10⁴⁰)/(1.055 × 10⁻³⁴) ≈ 2.56 × 10⁷⁴

Comment: This quantum number is astronomically large (~10⁷⁴). Since successive orbits differ by Δn = 1, a change of one quantum unit is utterly negligible compared to n itself, so the quantisation of the earth's orbit is far too fine to be observed — the orbit appears classically continuous. This illustrates Bohr's correspondence principle: quantum effects become imperceptible for macroscopic systems with very large quantum numbers, and classical mechanics is recovered as a limiting case.

6 Answer the following, comparing Thomson's and Rutherford's atomic models: (a) Is the average angle of deflection of alpha particles by a thin gold foil predicted by Thomson's model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model? (b) Is the probability of backward scattering (deflection angle greater than 90°) predicted by Thomson's model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?Thomson vs Rutherford model

(a) The average angle of deflection is about the same in both models. In both, the great majority of alpha particles undergo many small-angle deflections as they pass through the foil, and the resulting cumulative average scattering angle turns out to be comparable whether the positive charge is spread out (Thomson) or concentrated in a nucleus (Rutherford), because it is dominated by the numerous small-angle events rather than the rare large-angle ones.

(b) The probability of backward (large-angle, >90°) scattering predicted by Thomson's model is much less than that predicted by Rutherford's model. In Thomson's model the positive charge is spread over the whole atom, so the maximum force (and hence maximum deflection) in any single encounter is small — a single large-angle deflection is essentially impossible. In Rutherford's model, the positive charge is concentrated in a tiny nucleus, so a close encounter with it can produce a very strong repulsive force in a single collision, making occasional large-angle (even backward) scattering possible, exactly as observed experimentally.

Previous-year board questions 4

Q1 Using Bohr's postulates, derive an expression for the radius of the nth orbit of the hydrogen atom. 2023 3 marks

Consider an electron of charge −e and mass m revolving in a circular orbit of radius r around a nucleus of charge +Ze. The electrostatic (Coulomb) force of attraction provides the necessary centripetal force:

(1/4πε₀) × (Ze²/r²) = mv²/r ⟹ v² = Ze²/(4πε₀mr) ...(i)

Bohr's quantisation postulate states the angular momentum is quantised:

mvr = nh/2π ⟹ v = nh/(2πmr) ...(ii)

Squaring equation (ii): v² = n²h²/(4π²m²r²) ...(iii)

Equating (i) and (iii):

n²h²/(4π²m²r²) = Ze²/(4πε₀mr)

Solving for r:

r = n²h²ε₀/(πmZe²)

This can be written as rₙ = n²a₀/Z, where a₀ = ε₀h²/(πme²) ≈ 0.529 × 10⁻¹⁰ m is the Bohr radius (the radius of the innermost hydrogen orbit, n=1, Z=1). This shows the orbit radius grows as the square of the principal quantum number n.

Q2 Using the Rydberg formula, calculate the wavelength of the Hβ line of the Balmer series of the hydrogen spectrum (transition n = 4 to n = 2). (Given R = 1.097 × 10⁷ m⁻¹) 2022 2 marks

For the Balmer series, n₁ = 2. The Hβ line corresponds to the transition n₂ = 4 → n₁ = 2.

1/λ = R(1/n₁² − 1/n₂²) = 1.097 × 10⁷ × (1/2² − 1/4²) = 1.097 × 10⁷ × (0.25 − 0.0625) = 1.097 × 10⁷ × 0.1875

1/λ ≈ 2.057 × 10⁶ m⁻¹

λ = 1/(2.057 × 10⁶) ≈ 4.86 × 10⁻⁷ m = 486.2 nm

The Hβ line therefore appears at about 486.2 nm, in the blue-green part of the visible spectrum, consistent with observation.

Q3 A hydrogen atom in its ground state absorbs a photon of energy 12.75 eV. (a) Find the principal quantum number of the excited state to which the electron jumps. (b) Calculate the total number of spectral lines that can be emitted as the atom returns to the ground state. 2021 4 marks

(a) Finding the excited state:

Energy absorbed in a transition from the ground state (n=1) to level n is:

ΔE = 13.6(1 − 1/n²) eV

Given ΔE = 12.75 eV:

12.75 = 13.6(1 − 1/n²) ⟹ 1 − 1/n² = 12.75/13.6 = 0.9375 ⟹ 1/n² = 0.0625 ⟹ n² = 16 ⟹ n = 4

The electron is excited to the n = 4 level.

(b) Number of spectral lines:

N = n(n − 1)/2 = 4 × 3/2 = 6

So a maximum of 6 distinct spectral lines can be emitted as the atom cascades from n = 4 back to the ground state (n=1), corresponding to the transitions 4→3, 4→2, 4→1, 3→2, 3→1 and 2→1.

Q4 Using de Broglie's hypothesis, show that the circumference of the nth Bohr orbit is an integral multiple of the de Broglie wavelength of the electron in that orbit, and hence derive Bohr's quantisation condition for angular momentum. 2023 5 marks

According to de Broglie's hypothesis, a particle of mass m moving with speed v has an associated matter wave of wavelength:

λ = h/(mv)

For the electron's circular orbit to be a stable, non-radiating stationary state, de Broglie proposed that the electron wave must form a standing wave around the orbit — that is, the wave must join up smoothly on itself after one revolution without cancelling itself out through destructive interference. This is possible only if the circumference of the orbit contains an exact whole number of de Broglie wavelengths:

2πrₙ = nλ, where n = 1, 2, 3, …

Substituting the de Broglie wavelength λ = h/(mv):

2πrₙ = n × h/(mv)

Rearranging:

mvrₙ = nh/2π

This is exactly Bohr's second postulate — the quantisation of orbital angular momentum in integral multiples of h/2π — now obtained as a direct consequence of the wave nature of the electron, rather than as an independent ad hoc assumption. If the orbit did not contain a whole number of wavelengths, successive revolutions of the electron wave would destructively interfere and the orbit could not be sustained, explaining why only certain discrete orbits (specific values of n) are allowed.

Part of Priodemy for School

Interactive Maths & Science — free with every school on Priodemy EduSuite. Explore more chapters and labs on the Priodemy for School hub.

Ask AI